cornercorner

40-50L backpack... yes, I searched first.

Discuss and debate travel gear: backpacks, boots, packing stuff and all things technical like phones, mp3 players, GPS systems and other techno-gadgets.

Postby willis » January 24th, 2007

This Kelty Redwing 50L pack worked well on my last trip of three weeks.
User avatar
willis
Holds PhD in Packing
 
Posts: 144
Joined: October 30th, 2005


This thread doesn't have any tags.

You can still check out the tag index though.

What are tags?

Postby Tye7 » January 25th, 2007

Are there any websites that do reviews of backpacks? Especially related to travel.

Its hard to find good, conclusive information on backpacks.. probably why we see so many posts on these forums. Also, a lot of it is geared towards people bringing big packs (60-90L).

I'm really interested in reading about some first-hand experience with different gear on extended travels.

I've pretty much read every thread about backpacks in a few different forums. Obsessed? definitely.
User avatar
Tye7
Guidebook Dependent
 
Posts: 18
Joined: August 22nd, 2005

Postby mikeym » January 25th, 2007

Most companies don't even have decent pictures of their packs. It's usually just a single picture of the outside of the pack. If you're lucky, you'll get a picture of the suspension. It's very rare to show the inside of the pack, all of the external pockets, closeups, in use, etc.

With such little information, it's too much of a risk to buy a pack that you can't see in person, so if a pack isn't carried at REI, Any Mountain, or Redwood Trading Post, I can't get it. It's kind of a shame. I get up to Seattle sometimes, so I've been planning on taking the drive up to Vancouver to see some MEC gear.

- Mike
mikeym
Holds PhD in Packing
 
Posts: 251
Joined: August 13th, 2005

Postby static » January 26th, 2007

I have brought up this issue with our Marketing people, but it in their defense, it would be waaay cumbersome, as it would quadruple the photos that we already have. I would hasten to say that part of the strategy is to leave you curious enough to visit a Specialty Retailer where they can show you the spiffy features and close the sale. As more and more shopping is done entirely online this is changing the paradigm.
User avatar
static
Mod Squad
 
Posts: 16187
Joined: January 1st, 2001

Postby Tye7 » January 26th, 2007

I'm definitely part of a newer generation of shoppers.

I like to go online and research, read reviews, and then go to the store and try things on.

When I visit a website with a lack of information its about 10% curiosity and 90% frustration. A website is a company's online representation. If I go to a website and it provides me with all of the information I'm looking for, I'm impressed.

Eagle Creek is a good example of a website with good information. One of the best things is that they have pictures of people wearing the packs, so you can really gauge how big it is.

Osprey's website is definitely lacking information. They do have downloadable manuals, which is a step in the right direction. Having only a single picture is really not cutting it.
User avatar
Tye7
Guidebook Dependent
 
Posts: 18
Joined: August 22nd, 2005

Postby Brooke vs. the World » January 26th, 2007

Brian and I are both bringing ospreys. They are very comfortable and lightweight. Maybe the Atmos would work for you?
Brooke vs. the World - Travel Blog | Life in Furnished Property - Blog for Sydney housing :)

twitter.com/brookeschoenman
User avatar
Brooke vs. the World
Street Food Connoisseur
 
Posts: 683
Joined: July 24th, 2006

Postby Tye7 » January 26th, 2007

Today I went to the store and tried some on. Everything is so different in person.

surprisingly I really liked the mountainsmith Ramble. Even tho its 57L, it seemed small. It was comfortable and felt well made.

The Osprey Porter 46 on the other hand seemed huge. It may have been because it was packed with filler, but it really seemed huge for 46L.. also I didn't find it very comfortable. The straps all seemed very basic and uncomfortable. It did seem very well made though.

The eagle creek explorer trek was definitely smaller than the other ones, which is good, but It seemed to be lacking in the features. It really didn't seem much bigger than a daypack.. and for $135 I think there are better alternatives.

I didn't see the Lowe-Alpine Amazon 40L anywhere I went.

Right now I'm really leaning towards the Ramble. It seems like a pretty popular bag on many of the forums. I'm a little worried about it being too big. Its listed as carry-on legal though. I don't know how they squeeze 57L in there.. If I guessed I would say its 45L.

Any opinions?
User avatar
Tye7
Guidebook Dependent
 
Posts: 18
Joined: August 22nd, 2005

Postby static » January 26th, 2007

quote:
Any opinions?
Paralysis through analysis not allowed. Make a decision, buy something and go somewhere cool.
User avatar
static
Mod Squad
 
Posts: 16187
Joined: January 1st, 2001

Postby Tye7 » January 26th, 2007

Well after seeing the ramble at campmor for $70.. I think its too sweet to pass up.

Edit: purchased.
User avatar
Tye7
Guidebook Dependent
 
Posts: 18
Joined: August 22nd, 2005

Postby Piecar » January 29th, 2007

That Osprey is a nice looking bag. Exactly what I mentioned with the two compression straps. And flat. Good option Joe.

I agree with the comments about the dearth of good pics of various bags. The rigging is as important as the front. What kind of kooky marketers couldn't make it so that you wouldn't have to quadruple the pics?...How about, say, put more than one bag in one pic? One turned one way, one the other. Maybe one more-open. Marketers should be thinking outside the box.
User avatar
Piecar
Extra Pages in Passport
 
Posts: 3291
Joined: September 11th, 2003

Postby semicolon » February 6th, 2007

http://www.stepping-out.co.uk/html/snugpak_rucksacks_-_sleeka_for.html


I am a former "big bag" guy. I still have and use my NorthFace Extreme 80L bag. But last month I traveled home with a 35L bag.
It got me comfortably through a 3 day journey and 4 airplane rides without doing laundry..I even jammed in the top a good sized fleece and it ALL fit in the overhead compartment......
Self-determining karma wannabe....
User avatar
semicolon
Squat Toilet Professional
 
Posts: 786
Joined: July 12th, 2006
Location: Central Asia

Postby bigmaude » February 8th, 2007

Hey Tye - Looks like we are neighbors also. Any luck with the pack situation? I'm also looking for packs (45L for my daughter and myself and something much bigger for my two sons. Am having a hard time finding places in Charleston with good selections and prices. Any suggestions?
User avatar
bigmaude
Street Food Connoisseur
 
Posts: 518
Joined: January 2nd, 2007

Postby Tye7 » February 9th, 2007

I really like the Mountainsmith Ramble (57L). Its a little bigger than I wanted tho, but it is really comfortable. The Osprey Porter 46 would have been my second choice probably.
User avatar
Tye7
Guidebook Dependent
 
Posts: 18
Joined: August 22nd, 2005

Postby Brooke vs. the World » March 24th, 2007

bigmaude, u and your daughter could go for the osprey aura... i think the suspension would be much nicer than the porter - the airspeed will help keep your back from getting sweaty.
Brooke vs. the World - Travel Blog | Life in Furnished Property - Blog for Sydney housing :)

twitter.com/brookeschoenman
User avatar
Brooke vs. the World
Street Food Connoisseur
 
Posts: 683
Joined: July 24th, 2006

Postby TommyM » March 24th, 2007

I have the Eagle Creek explorer LT...and its pretty cool , not too big and it made rather well....
"So I'm Sorry That you've turned to driftwood, but you've been drifting for a long long time..."
User avatar
TommyM
Holds PhD in Packing
 
Posts: 134
Joined: January 23rd, 2007

Previous

Return to Travel Gear & Gadgets

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests




closer