cornercorner

How big is your boot

Discuss ways to satisfy your urge to travel without ruining the places we all want to see. Take only photographs, leave only footprints...

How big is your boot

Postby gonorth » October 21st, 2006

Of Course myfootprint Introduced by Cayce could not have a better home other than perhaps the new forum to come on Entertainment and Fun
---...--- ---...--- ---...--- ---...---
Joes portly antipodean pal
He just wants my port and cherry ripes
User avatar
gonorth
Extra Pages in Passport
 
Posts: 3686
Joined: April 23rd, 2004


This thread doesn't have any tags.

You can still check out the tag index though.

What are tags?

Postby gymboy689 » October 21st, 2006

quote:

CATEGORY ACRES

FOOD 5.4

MOBILITY 2.2

SHELTER 4.4

GOODS/SERVICES 5.9

TOTAL FOOTPRINT 18



IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.

WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.


IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 4.1 PLANETS.


I guess I'm above average for the country, but that's not really saying much.
User avatar
gymboy689
Knows What a Schengen Visa Is
 
Posts: 302
Joined: February 4th, 2005

Postby Markus » June 8th, 2007

quote:
CATEGORY GLOBAL HECTARES
FOOD 1.6
MOBILITY 0.6
SHELTER 0.9
GOODS/SERVICES 1.2
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 4.3

IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 8.8 GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.

WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 1.8 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.

IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 2.4 PLANETS.


I found the questions a little narrow in scope. I don't even own a car so the fuel efficiency question skews my results a bit. I think everyone should have some idea of their impact and constantly be striving to reduce it where they can. It's not about giving up everything you love and living like a dirty hippy, just making smart choices and the odd sacrifice now and then.
A detailed look at My Pack
Follow me on twitter
User avatar
Markus
Squat Toilet Professional
 
Posts: 873
Joined: May 27th, 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC

Postby Welsh Traveller » July 11th, 2007

CATEGORY GLOBAL HECTARES

FOOD 1.6

MOBILITY 0.9

SHELTER 0.7

GOODS/SERVICES 0.9

TOTAL FOOTPRINT 4.1



IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 5.3 GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.

WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 1.8 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.




IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 2.3 PLANETS.
____________________________________________________

I agree, the questions were very narrow in scope but then I guess it was just a rough guide.
I'm glad to be below average compared to my local counterparts but a lot more needs to be done by all of us.
Hobos On Tour Blog
__________________________
The traveler sees what he sees. The tourist sees what he has come to see. ~G.K. Chesterton
User avatar
Welsh Traveller
Holds PhD in Packing
 
Posts: 125
Joined: March 8th, 2005

Postby oswiu » January 29th, 2008

CATEGORY GLOBAL HECTARES
FOOD 1.6
MOBILITY 2
SHELTER 1.1
GOODS/SERVICES 2.4
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 7.1



IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 8.8 GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.

WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 1.8 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.

IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 3.9 PLANETS.

Just out of interest, I went back and answered the survey with what I thought were pretty much the best possible answers that are consistent with anything like a typical "western" lifestyle (no flying, no driving, conservation minded eating and living habits etc.) The answer?

IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 2.1 PLANETS.

This is really kind of disturbing.

Given that (nearly) everyone in the world today seems to aspire to SOMETHING like a typical western lifestyle (at least in terms of the levels of comfort and consumption,) the only answers seem to be that we must either radically change our views of what constitutes a desirable lifestyle, or significantly reduce the population of the planet...

Sadly, I don't see either of these happening any time soon.
_____________________________
Check out my New Travel 'Blog :) Over four years of worldwide wanderings (and counting!)
User avatar
oswiu
Squat Toilet Professional
 
Posts: 861
Joined: November 25th, 2003

Postby linds » February 13th, 2008

Hiya

I thought I'd do this seeing as I write about eco stuff and my results are almost embarrassing!

Because I usually live in London but am in Australia at the mo I did both based on the two lifestyles and, believe it or not, it looks as if overcrowded bustling London life is better for you than living in sparsely populated Oz 2hrs from the nearest city in an eco friendly designed house!

London life using public transport with regular trips to Europe:

CATEGORY GLOBAL HECTARES
FOOD 1.2
MOBILITY 1.5
SHELTER 1
GOODS/SERVICES 1.4
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 5.1

IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 5.3 GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.

WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 1.8 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.

IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 2.8 PLANETS.

Aussie life in an eco designed house 2hrs from anything, no public transport and loads of flying:

CATEGORY GLOBAL HECTARES
FOOD 2.2
MOBILITY 5.2
SHELTER 0.5
GOODS/SERVICES 4.4
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 12.3

IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 7.6 GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.

WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 1.8 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.

IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 6.8 PLANETS.

Thanks for putting this post on gonorth.
L
Eco Travel Logue
linds
Armchair Traveler
 
Posts: 38
Joined: November 21st, 2006


Return to Eco Travel

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests




closer