cornercorner

DSLR vs PAS

Traveling with 35mm cameras, digital cameras, camcorders, film, memory cards 'n All. BootsnAll members are welcome to post their travel photo albums, documented meetings with other members and brag-shots here.

DSLR vs PAS

Postby Andilad » August 24th, 2006

Hi I am planning a RTW and am a keen photographer. During my previous travelling I have been very impressed and enjoyed using my Cannon Powershot S60.

Recently I have invested in a Nikon D50 plus Tamron 70-300... which I have found to be a fantastic camera.. now my dilema is prehaps obvious.. whilst travelling is the D50 worth the weight... or is the Powershot going to do everything I need.

The major downside on the Cannon is the crud battery, which the Nikon beats hands down.. and the major benefit of the Nikon is the zoom - getting me a lot of shots I wouldn't get otherwise.

Anyone been in a similar situation? Any thoughts? Advice?

Thanks
Andy
Andilad...
Andilad
Armchair Traveler
 
Posts: 31
Joined: June 8th, 2004


This thread doesn't have any tags.

You can still check out the tag index though.

What are tags?

Postby Mitch Baltuch » August 24th, 2006

As with any question of this sort, there is no right, or wrong answer. It depends on what you want to get out of your photography efforts. For me, that means I travel with a full kit, DSLR, at least 3 lenses, flash unit and tripod, plus the other assorted things I need (batteries, media, some tools, etc.). I feel that I get the best pictures this way, because I have the most flexibility in responding to any situation I happen to come across.

If your goal is just to get some good memory shots and the like, then a point and shoot is fine. A good one will get you very nice pictures, but always within the limitations of your equipment. For example, wide to zoom is limited to the capability of the camera, with no chance to change it. You can work around that by being creative, but that won't always work.

Short answer, ask 10 people, get 10 different opinions. Only your opinion counts in the end.

Mitch
Mitch Baltuch
Mountain Storm Fine Arts
http://www.mountainstorm.com
Mitch Baltuch
Lost in Place
 
Posts: 63
Joined: January 17th, 2006

Postby genaro » August 24th, 2006

If you have to ask, take the point and shoot.

If you're really a keen photographer, you don't have to ask.
[IMG]http://cherveny.bol.ucla.edu/irwin5.jpg[/IMG]
User avatar
genaro
Street Food Connoisseur
 
Posts: 664
Joined: September 8th, 2005

Postby Andilad » August 24th, 2006

Both good points..

I guess I haven't decided what I want out of it, I am quite tempted to take both. Which is possibly total madness, but I want the DSLR for the 'good' shots and the PAS for the nights out 'snaps'

I would say I was truely a keen photographer - at home.. but I am not sure I can be a keen backpacker and keen photographer at the same time..

Thanks for the thoughts

Andy
Andilad...
Andilad
Armchair Traveler
 
Posts: 31
Joined: June 8th, 2004

Postby marksda1 » August 25th, 2006

As fo Big Grin r as overseas, I've only taken my Canon 20D to Italy so far, but I don't regret it at all.

For me, there was no question about which camera I wanted with me. While I'd gotten some excellent memory shots with my Olympus PAS, it wasn't a DSLR. It had limits.

What worried me wasn't the weight but $$$, but I verified that my insurance covered it and with me it went.

Truly, it is a question you have to answer for yourself. Smile
User avatar
marksda1
Holds PhD in Packing
 
Posts: 242
Joined: November 6th, 2003
Location: Montezuma, Georgia

Postby SurfingDan » August 26th, 2006

what genaro said...

If you can see yourself surviving without it, then dont take it. If it's an extension of your arm (and you know who you are), then take it.
---------------------------
"This is what you shall do: Love the earth and sun and animals. Stand up for the stupid and crazy. Take your hat off to no man." - Edward Abbey
User avatar
SurfingDan
Knows What a Schengen Visa Is
 
Posts: 453
Joined: August 4th, 2004

Postby Capt Steve » November 1st, 2006

a camera is worthless unless you have it with you when a photo-op presents itself. So in my mind, the key is to have a camera with you at all times. I own(ed) a Canon S60 and a Canon Digital Rebel SLR. I've taken the Digital SLR on three trips this past year. No question I took some excellent shots by having that gear with me. That being said, carrying it (and the big extra telephoto lens) was a pain in the ass. My personal preference is to not carry such big gear.

So, I'm in the process of selling the DSLR and the S60, and I'm buying the new Canon G7 and an SD600. The SD600 is truly a PAS you can always have with you. And I think the G7 will match, if not exceed, what I could do with the DSLR, for a fraction of the cost and weight. I'd be happy to explain this further if anyone is interested.

In the end, it's usually the photographer, not the gear, that makes the photo. I've taken some of my best shot with a fixed lens 35mm Olympus film pocket camera.
User avatar
Capt Steve
Extra Pages in Passport
 
Posts: 2729
Joined: May 25th, 2004

Postby The Touron King » November 1st, 2006

I do a lot of hiking and am very conscious of my overall pack weight. Every item I pack on a trip is carefully considered. But despite the extra weight I travel with both my powershot and 10D.

I manage to use the 10D about two-thirds of the time. When I don't want to feel the physical and fiscal burden, I leave the dSLR somewhere safe and slide the PAS in my pocket to get pics that I wouldn't get otherwise.

Whatever you do, take the dSLR. What better reason is there to have such a bitchin' camera than a RTW trip?
-----------------------------
Kelsey Timmerman
Author of Where Am I Wearing?
SCUBA instructor, Touron
www.WhereAmIwearing.com
User avatar
The Touron King
Holds PhD in Packing
 
Posts: 128
Joined: October 13th, 2006


Return to Travel Photography, Video and Photo Albums

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests




closer