cornercorner

Side trip from Rome to Venice and back to Rome

Information on the most visited continent in the world. Learn about Eurailing in the summer, travel through post-communist countries and what to do in London with a 12-hour layover.

Side trip from Rome to Venice and back to Rome

Postby MikeSD » July 14th, 2008

I'm going to be in Rome for a week and wanted to take a side trip to Venice. I have heard that most people only spend a day there.

I have checked rail and they seem to leave in the afternoon and arrive in the evening, meaning I'd have to stay over a night.

Are there any trains that leave early in the morning and return late at night? Or should I just bite the bullet and get a hotel in the Venice area for the night? I guess the advantage of traveling in the afternoon is one would get a good view of the country, along the way. Just wondering how convenient it is to go from Rome to Venice and back to Rome.
MikeSD
Thorn Tree Refugee
 
Posts: 11
Joined: July 14th, 2008


Tags: rome, italy, venice

Postby 2wanderers » July 14th, 2008

According to DB, there's a train every hour or two, so timing should be easy. The early outbound trains are at 4.28a or 9.50a. That said, it's a 4.5 hour trip each way, by Eurostar, and the last high speed departure is at 6:30pm. So that makes for a hell of a day trip, leaving only a few hours to see Venice. I'd certainly vote for staying a night or two, and trying to see more than its three most famous spots.
User avatar
2wanderers
Extra Pages in Passport
 
Posts: 3210
Joined: August 20th, 2003
Location: Edmonton, Canada

Postby Jester » July 14th, 2008

First-there's plenty of trains back and forth between Rome and Venice, so it's fairly convenient.

I wouldn't go to Venice for a day. 2wanderers is right, you'll spend most of it on the train. I don't know how well you travel, but I'm in fairly good shape, and usually after spending 5 hours on a train I'm a little tired, which is not ideal for cramming an entire city into one afternoon. Plus Venice is kind of tricky, you'll need to be able to orient yourself, and you can't do that if you've only got a couple hours.

Lastly, and I say this a lot, I read it in the very first book I picked up when I decided to go to Europe: you only get to go to ______(Venice) for the first time once. Don't ruin it by rushing around and not really seeing anything.

I recommend staying 2 nights there, which isn't really ideal but you've only got a week. If you can't do that, I'd spend the time in Rome. Actually, if it were me I'd do just Rome--your first day is shot because of travel, your last day might be shot for similar reasons, so now you're down to 5 days. Rome's got plenty of stuff to fill 5 days with.
I think it’s safe to say he didn’t think this all the way through. He’s maybe the most famous person on earth. Of course he got caught. The Statue of Liberty could go buy some weed and have a better chance at getting away with it than he did.
User avatar
Jester
Extra Pages in Passport
 
Posts: 4860
Joined: January 18th, 2005

Postby JessieS » July 14th, 2008

Yes, plenty of people only spend a day there - and those are the people who are missing out on the best things about Venice. Plus, doing it as a day-trip from Rome is a hellishly long day. Stay the night, you'll thank yourself later. If it were my trip, I'd advocate for staying at least 2 nights, if not more, but if you just want to get a taste of the city without running around like a headless chicken, one overnight is fine (so long as it's an early-ish arrival & late-ish departure the next day).

You can read about Venice on the BootsnAll Italy Travel Guide (beware, I love Venice and tend to gush a bit), and on my last trip I stayed in the Hotel Astoria and toured the Hotel Dalla Mora. For a more budget option, try the only HI hostel in Venice, Ostello Venezia.

And on the other hand, there's the argument that there's plenty to do in Rome to keep you busy for a week (or more), and Venice will be there the next time you're in Italy. There are also other day-trip options that are closer to Rome & which you really could do in a day. Just a suggestion. Smile
The Official BootsnAll Italy Travel Guide
Are you on Twitter? Follow me!
User avatar
JessieS
Mod Squad
 
Posts: 4087
Joined: February 23rd, 2005
Location: Portland, Oregon

Postby kpaige » August 29th, 2008

I very much agree with JessieS and the other posters on this plan- Venice at twilight is worth seeing, and the sheer beauty of getting lost amoungst the streetlamps is part of what makes Venice memorable---at least for me. If you are going to make the 5 hour train trek, it will be worth it to stay for at least one night.

North-Eastern Italy as a whole is a fantastic itinerary- with stops like Verona, Bologna, Padua, Ferrara and of course, Venince, you could make a lovely holiday out of that region of the country. To echo what has been posted, there are many exciting daytrips in the Lazio and surrounding areas, and Rome itself has an ENDLESS amount of things to see and do- with the limited time frame, I might consider Venice for the next trip to Italy. (February, during Carnivale is particularly nice!)

~kpm
______________________________
"we shall not cease from exploration, and the end of all our exploring will be to arrive where we started, and know the place for the first time.."
~eliot
User avatar
kpaige
Armchair Traveler
 
Posts: 42
Joined: August 28th, 2008

Postby zoomcharlieb » September 4th, 2008

Venice is way too cool and the night reflections on the water and the streets and alley ways at night are so photogenic that you'll wonder why you are spending so much time in Rome.

charlie
User avatar
zoomcharlieb
Street Food Connoisseur
 
Posts: 526
Joined: June 24th, 2007


Return to Europe Travel

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests




closer