The Great RTW Debate!
Do you think less of me? Re-phrase. Do you think EVEN less of me?
The way I like to travel is in month-or-so chunks. Go to one place or area, hang out there long enough to get to know it as much as possible, then head home to my pillow, dog, partner and life. Recharge batteries. Rinse and repeat. And no, I donâ€™t just go to places and â€œsee the sitesâ€. Depending on the destination and purpose of the trip, I try to immerse myself as much as possible in the local scene. And yes, I realize that by only spending a short amount of time in an area, I limit my ability to do that somewhat. But I manage pretty well.
So here are my questions for you RTW advocates.
What do you experience (and what do I miss out on) when you travel RTW and I donâ€™t? All I can think of is that maybe you feel a sense of accomplishment. The â€œI did itâ€ factor. But that doesnâ€™t seem like that big a deal since, well, itâ€™s not as if youâ€™re navigating the globe in a hot air balloon. Airplanes are airplanes, border crossings are border crossings. Still, I'm sure there is an endurance factor involved, so I can understand that somewhat.
Which leads me to the other thing I think I may be missing out on. I imagine you experience â€œhigher highsâ€ because you also experience â€œlower lowsâ€ when youâ€™re on the road for that length of time. If weâ€™re all honest about itâ€¦.traveling for a long period can be pretty weary at times. So I imagine the inevitable â€œlowsâ€ of a long-term trip only make the â€œhighsâ€ feel that much better.
What else am I missing out on?
I don't necessarily see any advantage in a traditional RTW sort of trip assuming that in your one location trip you are immersing yourself as much as you like. I imagine that the popularity in this RTW has grown along with the widely available specialized air tickets now available.
After our recent trip, my wife decided that she would much rather do trips of a month to a more localized area in the future.
We got pretty tired going for so long but really enjoyed the once-in-a-lifetime experience of being real vagabonds and not working for that period of time and distancing ourselves from our "normal" lives--there was some psychological revelations to all of that.
But we'll do shorter trips from now on!
I suppose that's true.
If it's less then a month I consider it a mini-trip. 1-3 months is to me a fantastic vacation
anything longer and I'm afraid I'll never get back to reality.
Maybe one day I'll do a RTW trip that lasts 6-8 months, a year, or whatever...but for now I'm good with 1.5ish months.
'The time has come,' the Walrus said,
'To talk of many things:
Of shoes -- and ships -- and sealing wax --
Of cabbages -- and kings --
And why the sea is boiling hot --
And whether pigs have wings
And I suppose traveling for a longer time is cheaper than taking a several different trips. For example, when deciding whether to include Vietnam in my current itinerary, I'm reminded that if I save the country for a separate trip, I'll have to spend another $2000 bucks and 20 hours to fly back across the Pacific. If I include it in the big trip, I'll only spend $100 and an hour to fly from Laos.
Don't click here.
But when I'm earthbound by the powers that be (my dad) I don't much crave the little month-long escapades.. their scheduled returns make me too conscious about society's gravitation pull. Anyway, as I wrote earlier I enjoy them (in the meassure I percieve them to be enjoyable). In other words, dont look a gift horse in the mouth.. or better put, take what life has to offer... and if it's only small trips.. well, rejoice. However, if you can and are able to, getting out of your life will open undreamt-of new windows of perspective. But that's just crazy ol' me
Happy New Year to all !
The Wander Yonder
As Matt says, odn't feel pressured into doing a RTW just because it's the "real travellers" thing to do. Nobody has written a rule book saying you must travel in a particular way. Do whatever you're comfortable with.
Menudio touched on something, about how on long-term trips there can be moments of revelation, for lack of a better word. And globetrotter went into it more deeply.
I'm just interested in hearing how it's different when you're on the road for a long time.
That was just a joke.
Humor is hard on the internet.
I'm just interested in hearing from people who do the "mega-trips" because I'm curious as to what I might be missing out on, if anything.
I have never done the 'mega-trips' but I have done 3 months here, 5 months there, the one-way ticket overseas thing, and such. And I've thought about the RTW but I just don't see many positives to it. Well unless I had tons-o-money. But sooo many people I meet doing the RTW never seem to stay in one place as long as I'd like too, example...I spent nearly 3 months in NZ and it was just long enough to get a good feel for the place, to hike a bunch of the big trails, to get around to almost every corner, to venture off the path, etc... to really enjoy it. But I met soo many people just stopping by there for 3 weeks or so before heading off to Fiji for a week, then LA for a week, then eastern Europe for 2 weeks and all this after spending 2 or 3 weeks in places in Indai and Asia. Many of these people just rushed through areas seemingly checking them off a list and hurring on to the next stop. Now maybe that's how some people like to travel but it's just not for me. Again I spent 2 months in Thailand and many RTWer's thought that was ridiculous but I thought it was hardly enough time, I barely saw half the country, but when i woke up in my little beach hut and walked down to my favorite cafe for the 8th morning in a row, I waved to the little old lady on her porch, she was always there and then when I get there they bring out my iced coffee with out even asking, the waiter would sit down and we'd talk for a while, basically I'm saying i got to know people and become familair with the area, explore all the woods, swim at every beach, etc...
And I think allowing yourself the freedom of a one-way ticket with no plans on where to go next or when to go home can offer the same type of personall satitisfation and discovery as a RTW.
Ok I just re-read my post a bit and it may come off too harsh on you rtwer's. I don't mean to sound like that, I just want to support my form of traveling. And I'm also interested in hearing some more responses from you rtwer's and hopefully some of you who have traveled both styles could give a bit of compare and contrast.
Originally posted by travis:
I'd like too, example...I spent nearly 3 months in NZ and it was just long enough to get a good feel for the place, to hike a bunch of the big trails, to get around to almost every corner, to venture off the path, etc... to really enjoy it.
Yes, that's how I am too. I like to savor places. Now granted I am a virgin traveler so I don't have any input, except for U.S. travel...but this is how I will be traveling in the future.
I was in southern Spain for only a week last year, and even sticking to just southern Spain was too much of a whirlwind for me - I could have extended southern spain to 2-3 weeks easily, which would mean ALL of Spain would take maybe 6 weeks??
Sorry to derail the thread. I just liked what you wrote, travis.
I would love to hear from other RTW travelers as well.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests